Presenting a complex argument in an ultra-compact way: a precise claim (Claim) immediately followed by its quantified proof (Evidence). No superfluous context, no needless nuance — just the thesis and its demonstration.
Claim-Evidence is the most compact argument structure there is: a claim immediately followed by its proof. No superfluous context, no needless nuance — just the thesis and its demonstration.
What it does. Presents complex arguments in an ultra-compact way. Ideal for situations where the audience is expert and impatient.
Claim — a precise, clear statement, one that can be true or false.
Evidence — empirical proof that makes the claim highly probable.
Claim 1: the move to microservices will cut your time-to-market by 40%.
Evidence: across your last 20 sprints, 65% of lead time is wait time between dependent teams. Our architecture removes 80% of those dependencies.
Claim 2: the migration risk is manageable.
Evidence: the strangler-fig pattern on 3 similar clients — zero service interruption, an 18-month migration in both cases.
Claim 3: ROI turns positive within 18 months.
Evidence: estimated migration cost: €1.2M. Annualised velocity gain: €800K. Infrastructure savings: €350K/year. ROI turns positive at month 16.
Claim-Evidence = an ultra-compact, evidence-based argument. Every Claim (a precise statement) is immediately followed by its Evidence (quantified proof). It's the structure for debates with experts and recommendations to the C-suite.
An outside perspective to build your quantified arguments and rehearse under real conditions.